In the aftermath of the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School on queue the anti-gun
talking heads trip all over themselves calling for stricter gun laws and as
usual they failed to think the tragedy through clearly. In their minds they’ve identified the cause
of the problem, at least what they wanted the cause to be. The gun was just the tool of choice, it could
have just as well been an ax, a hammer, a baseball bat, an automobile or even a
couple of gallons of household cleaner (with a potential for an even more
devastating attack).
As a mechanic I look at catastrophic
system failures through a different perspective, the failure is often the end
result of a list of cascading occurrences and missed opportunities. I’m not privy to first hand information so
all I can do is ask questions that came to mind from the information I’ve gleaned
from the news reports. Maybe someone
will come forward with the answers.
First
Why was a gun available to a person with a
documented mental illness? It’s been
reported that his mother used it as a way to connect with him. Did she get the opinion of a mental health
care professional on the suitability of this form of interaction?
Would the form of mental illness this young
man suffered from make him prone to violence or acting out? Did he have access to violent movies or video
games that would feed these tendencies?
Was this young man on pharmaceutical
maintenance and was it verified he was taking it as prescribed?
Moving on
Was a single locked door the entire
security plan for the school, had they even discussed contingency plans? Do they have severe weather drills, fire
drills, have they even considered an intruder drill? Was Columbine so long ago they don’t
remember?
Did they ever consider an armed security
guard or did they find a “Gun Free Zone” sign was the best protection
available? If “GFZ” signs are the answer
why have TSA in airports.
Did they consider the presents of an armed
security guard to be offensive or detrimental? How do they feel about the police officer on
patrol in their neighborhood?
Finally
Is the rampant and speculative news
coverage of the attack informing or is just emotional fodder to forward an
agenda? Are the best decisions on a
course of action really made on an emotional level?
With the news originations continually comparing
this and that shooting, repeating the same tragedy for hours on end, giving
this and that witness’s verbal replay, bringing in experts to analyze every
step, does it feel like its being treated like a sporting event?
Just waiting on the next High
Score Gamer…
Report the facts and step back! Give the families, the community space and
time to come to grips with the sadness they face.
Like I said, I don’t have any answers, only
questions. I wonder if the “Officials”
who have already come out with their solutions to prevent this tragedy from
happening again have the answers to my questions. Have they even pondered these thoughts? Is this just another photo op for their
cause… The One That “Went Their Way”…
Here are a few stories that don’t
fit the Administration “Gun Control Agenda” so they haven’t and won’t get much
coverage in the mainstream media.
What can one armed “GOOD GUY” or in this case “GOOD GIRL” do… Stop
another theater shooting! Follow this link to read the story of Sgt. Lisa
Castellano, she put down a gunman that entered a theater in San Antonio TX .
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Officers-that-stopped-theater-gunman-get-standing/JRZbElUe-EyTQpvL7F8WIQ.cspx
Or the story of Nick Meli a
citizen that confronted a gunman bent on murder in an Oregon shopping mall.
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=6&f=2777&t=11071749
Maybe the story of Jeanne Assam
who stopped Matthew Murrays’ rampage at the New
Life Church
in Colorado .
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/dec/11/nation/na-shoot11
And closer to the tragedy of Sandy Hook Elementary School ,
the story of Vice Principal Joel Myrick of Pearl MS . He stopped Luke Woodham’s murder spree by
confronting him with the .45 Colt he kept secure in his vehicle “Just in case”.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2969715/posts
I admit this is a somewhat cold and deliberate
look at the tragedy, I do feel sadness for the little ones that were taken. I’m also touched by the heroics of the adults
that did what they could to protect them. I even have a bit of sympathy for the family
of the assailant. But most of all, I’m
crushed by the thought knowing this WILL happen again if the fairytale
solutions being offered up are enacted.
Criminals will always have guns, you can only regulate whether
law-abiding citizens can fight back or not.
The TOMCAT
RT & FB share. Great article. Wished I had seen earlier
ReplyDelete