If you haven’t read the first
part you may want to take a moment to catch-up.
Labels (part 1) http://thetomcatblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/labels.html
Several months back a case came before the
Supreme Court of the United
States involving the use of labeling for
products (Barf Sunshine Citrus Cola Company vs. Coke-Da-Cola Company). Succumbing to Barf’s emotional appeal of
“…everything would be fair, equal and we would feel better about ourselves…”,
the court came down in favor of the plaintive, Barf Sunshine Citrus (and as a
side note: Dingle Berry Bio-fuel Company was also allowed to use the
coke-da-cola label). Barfs had finished
its packaging refit and has begun distributing its drink expecting to soon see
the profits start rolling in but instead of gaining market shares their sales
plummeted, along with the sales of the original Coke-Da-Cola Company and Dingle
Berry
Bio-fuel Company. Consumers no longer
knew if they were going to get a cola drink, a citrus drink or a mouth full of
Bio-fuel.
(All of the players weren’t on the field,
you have to look who’s on the sidelines sometimes.)
Since its inception in 2011 Barf Sunshine
Citrus Cola Company had been receiving financial backing from a silent
investor, the only stipulation for receiving continued support was, Barfs would
pursue the Coke-Da-Cola label. It has
now come out this investor was Preppy Cola Company (Coke-Da-Colas’ number one
competitor). Now with Coke-Da-Cola all
but ruined Preppy Cola has discontinued financial support of Barf Sunshine
Citrus Cola Company leaving them to flounder with a diminishing consumer
base. The executives and employees of
Barfs were little more than useful idiots being played by Preppy Cola to
destroy its competition… The folks at
Dingle Berry
Bio-fuel Company were even bigger idiots, they had no financing offered to
them, they just saw a cause and jumped on the band-wagon without thinking it
through. Preppy Cola is now set to be
number one in the cola drink market with no creditable competition.
“Useful Idiots” that’s all the gay/lesbian
community are. There are three barriers
that an Authoritarian/Totalitarian Government must overcome to achieve its
goal… Freedom of Speech, a well-armed populace and Religion. The attacks on gun owners is well documented
and ongoing, speech will fall when the other two have been crushed. How could religion be cut-down?
All the mainstream religions define
“Marriage” as a union between one man and one woman and most consider any other
arrangement an offence to GOD but as soon as gay and lesbian MARRIAGES are
listed as a “Human Right” any religion/church that disputes or declines to take
part in the full recognition of the new protected class (at man’s whim) will be
labeled as “Discriminatory” and as a discriminatory organization it will no
longer be entitled to the usual protections from government intrusion (i.e.
taxation… most likely to the enth degree and collapse). Or the religion/church would have to submit
to the whims of man and disavow the 2,000+ years of their teaching undermining
its standing with its followers. Either
way religion will be hard-pressed to survive as we know it. On the other hand if the term, or label, Marriage
retains its current meaning and the gay/lesbian union is deemed “Domestic
Partners” religion/churches are unaffected because they have no part in
sanctifying, need or desire to participate in the arrangement as they do in
marriages.
The gay and lesbian communities are being
spurred on and used as “Useful Idiots” by people with an ideology that uses
people or groups and pits them against each other to further their own agendas…
you see it every day on TV, families of shooting victims used as a backdrop for
a speech on gun control, factory workers as a backdrop at a speech threatening
lay-offs, storm ravaged towns used as a backdrop for political pandering (the
list goes on)… All useful idiots that are quickly forgotten once they have been
USED!
If you’re thinking my scenario is over the
top you may want to consider these cases that have already come before lower
courts…
An Illinois
state panel says it has found "substantial evidence"
that two businesses discriminated against a gay couple looking for a venue for
their civil union ceremony. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/17/gay-discrimination-case-m_n_929414.html
Doctors in California may not discriminate against gay
patients on the basis of their religious beliefs, the
state's Supreme Court ruled http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSVPwhSblZFqxwONphszXiHega3w
A photographer
who declined to shoot the commitment ceremony of a lesbian couple. An attorney
for the couple, however, argued that the business openly advertises its wedding photography
services, and as a public business is required to follow the same
anti-discrimination laws as any other company. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/appeal-photographer-gay-bias-case-heard
These are just a few examples of
cases that have been in the system at lower level courts, laying the foundation
and if you’ve noticed some of the wording that had been slipped in is very
telling. I especially took note of the
story with the photographer “ openly advertises its wedding
photography services”. They didn’t
advertises Civil Union photography services did they???
It still comes down to a basic fact,
homosexuality is a behavior… nothing more, nothing less, it’s all about
choosing to participate in an activity… or not.
To force its acceptance upon those that view it as sordid, is
Tyrannical.
We’ll see how this plays out
The TOMCATNote to the professional photographers (and others out there), If your approached to do something like this kindly decline the first request if you like, but if pressed give them a cut-rate price… and cut rate work. Myself, the smart-a$$ that I am, I would’ve given them a day they would have never forgotten!
No comments:
Post a Comment